TLP:CLEAR · PUBLICTECHNOLOGIES ACTERON INC. · QUÉBEC, CANADA
The Missing Category

SEAP: Zero Trust
for Code Execution

Software executes untrusted code by default. Identity and Network are solved pillars of Zero Trust. The third — what code is actually allowed to run — has no enforcement layer. SEAP is that layer.

Zero Trust Code™ · Default-Deny Execution Authorization
Declared Executed

An SBOM lists what you intended to ship. A signature attests to who published it. Neither governs what the kernel actually runs at the moment of execution — the only point that matters to an attacker.

Identity Integrity

A valid signature proves provenance, not behavior. Signed malware is real. Compromised-but-trusted packages execute with full privilege. Trusted is not the same as authorized to run, here, now.

The Zero Trust Stack

Two Pillars Are Enforced. One Is Not.

Zero Trust rebuilt enterprise security around a single principle: never trust, always verify. The industry operationalized it for the two surfaces it could reach — who is asking and where they connect. The surface where the actual damage happens — what code runs — was left to advisory tooling that observes and recommends, but cannot stop.

PILLAR 01

Identity

Who you are. IAM, IdP, MFA — authorize the principal before access.
✓ ENFORCED
PILLAR 02

Network

Where you connect. ZTNA, segmentation — authorize the path before traffic.
✓ ENFORCED
PILLAR 03

Execution

What code runs. The unguarded decision in every modern attack chain.
◆ SEAP CLOSES IT
The Enforcement Gap

Detection Is Not Enforcement

The supply-chain security market is dense with tools that find known-bad: dependency scanners, SBOM generators, signature verifiers, behavioral detectors. They are valuable and they are necessary. They are also, structurally, advisory — they produce a recommendation, after the artifact is already on the host, that a human or a downstream system may or may not act on in time.

None of them stand between a binary and the CPU. A verified-but-malicious package, a compromised maintainer's signed release, a transitive dependency that pivots at install time — all of these pass every advisory gate and then execute.

Scanning finds known bads.
SEAP ensures only authorized goods can run.

SEAP inverts the model. Instead of enumerating what to block — an unwinnable race against an infinite adversary — it enforces a default-deny posture at the kernel level: nothing executes unless it has been explicitly authorized for this workload, in this context, right now. Every execution attempt resolves to a synchronous, audited verdict before a single instruction runs.

Execution Attempt
ALLOW
or
DENY
Kernel level · deterministic
Why Now

The Detection Model Is Buckling

The premise that you can keep up by tracking every known vulnerability is collapsing in public view. On April 15, 2026, NIST formally abandoned universal enrichment of the National Vulnerability Database, citing a 263% surge in CVE submissions between 2020 and 2025. Going forward it enriches only a prioritized subset — KEV-listed, federal, and EO 14028 critical software — and reclassified the entire pre-March-2026 backlog as Not Scheduled.

~29K
Backlogged CVEs reclassified "Not Scheduled"
263%
CVE submission growth, 2020–2025
Apr 15
2026 — universal enrichment ends
The structural consequence

Any defense keyed to CVE enrichment now has a permanent, growing blind spot it cannot detect through its own workflow. A control that authorizes execution by policy rather than by a list of known-bad identifiers does not depend on that enrichment pipeline at all. Enforcement that is independent of the CVE backlog is no longer a nice-to-have — it is the only model that scales.

The Category

Software Execution Authorization Platform

SEAP is not another scanner, EDR, or SBOM tool sitting in the advisory layer. It defines a new control point: the execution authorization boundary — the moment between a binary exists on the host and a binary runs on the CPU. That boundary has always existed. Until now, nothing enforced policy across it.

This is a completeness framing, not a competitive one. Identity decides who. Network decides where. SEAP decides what runs — and produces cryptographically verifiable evidence of every decision. Three pillars, one principle, finally enforced end to end.

From commit to execution,
zero tolerated executions.

One Question Your Stack Can't Yet Answer

Was this binary explicitly authorized to run — here, now, under this workload identity — and can you prove it? SEAP is how you answer yes.

STAGE-HONEST DISCLOSURE · Active proof-of-concept · IP filings underway (USPTO / CIPO)
Capability claims reflect architecture and design intent, not certified production maturity.

References

  1. NIST. "NIST Updates NVD Operations to Address Record CVE Growth." April 2026. nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/04/nist-updates-nvd-operations-address-record-cve-growth
  2. Cloud Security Alliance. "NVD Triage Overhaul: End of Universal CVE Enrichment" (~29,000 reclassified; 263% growth context). April 2026. labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org/research/csa-research-note-nist-nvd-enrichment-overhaul-20260429-csa
  3. The Hacker News. "NIST Limits CVE Enrichment After 263% Surge in Vulnerability Submissions." April 2026. thehackernews.com/2026/04/nist-limits-cve-enrichment-after-263.html